Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) the golden rule.
B) the parol evidence rule.
C) the contra proferentum rule.
D) the absurdity rule.
E) the fact that oral terms of contracts are never enforceable.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It is a statement expressed by one of the parties.
B) It is sometimes inserted into a contract by a court.
C) It cannot create an enforceable legal obligation.
D) It can be used to rectify a mistake in a contractual document.
E) It is always based on the standard in the industry that the parties are engaged in.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) always results in litigation.
B) never results in litigation.
C) will have more than one plausible meaning.
D) will always have only one plausible meaning.
E) will always have six possible meanings.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Sue his broker for negligence
B) Sue his broker for misrepresentation
C) Sue his broker for deceit
D) Orson has no remedy;his broker was stating an opinion
E) Orson has no remedy;his broker was making a statement of future conduct
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If one of the parties acts fraudulently they must pay damages to the other party.
B) If one of the parties commits a tort against the other,the contract will be terminated.
C) If one of the parties acts without a duty of care to the working relationship,the other can terminate the contract and keep all money already paid.
D) If one of the parties acts without a duty of care to its employees,the contract is rescinded.
E) If both parties no longer want to work together,the contract is rescinded.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) can reduce the amount of time a company spends answering questions from customers about confusing terminology.
B) is required by the official Communications Policy of the Government of Canada.
C) can be mandated by law.
D) makes it more difficult for businesses to enforce contracts.
E) was strategically avoided in the past.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) never enforceable.
B) enforceable only if the terms on the back of the ticket have actually been read by the customer.
C) enforceable only if the customer knew about the terms on the back of the ticket.
D) enforceable only if the terms on the back of the ticket are initialed by the customer.
E) enforceable only if reasonable notice of the terms was given when the contract was made.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) creates a legally enforceable obligation.
B) is a promissory statement.
C) will always induce a contract.
D) is a voluntary agreement to do something in the future.
E) can be made by words or conduct.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) An innocent misrepresentation may trigger an award of damages.
B) A fraudulent misrepresentation may trigger rescission but not damages.
C) A negligent misrepresentation may trigger damages but not rescission.
D) An innocent misrepresentation may be rescinded.
E) A pre-contractual misrepresentation may trigger relief in contract but not relief in tort.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) As interpreted by the golden rule,Reeba may be asked to work weekends.
B) As per the parol evidence rule,the verbal assurance is not part of the contract.
C) The contra proferentem rule may apply if the judge thinks the term is unreasonable.
D) If not working weekends is a term that induces Reeba to sign the contract,it may create a collateral contract.
E) Having all weekends off is a term implied by statute.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) is made with the intention to induce a contract.
B) is a promissory statement.
C) does not impose a contractual obligation.
D) is a form of misrepresentation.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It will fail because it is never possible to exclude tort liability by way of contract.
B) It will only succeed if the distributor personally points out to the consumer that by drinking the water they are waiving their right to sue.
C) It will succeed as long as the label on the bottle constitutes reasonable notice of the exclusion clause.
D) The exclusion clause must be written in reasonably clear language that makes it relevant to the liability to be excluded in order for the exclusion clause to be effective.
E) Exclusion clauses are not enforceable in a court of law.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If he sues,Samuel will likely obtain a damage award.
B) If he sues,Samuel will likely succeed in a tort action.
C) Samuel is stuck with the boat.
D) Ben may have to take the boat back and return Samuel's money.
E) Ben may seek to get his boat back even if Samuel wants to keep it.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Nate is bound by the clause's terms simply because they were included.
B) Nate can argue he was not given reasonable notice.
C) Nate is bound only if the clause used unambiguous language.
D) Nate is bound by the terms because the attendant pointed out the clauses.
E) Nate is only free of the clause if it was written unreasonably small.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) a damage award for breach of contract.
B) the remedy of rescission.
C) the remedy of an injunction.
D) the remedy of an incision.
E) a fine for breach of contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) a kind of mistake.
B) an opinion that turns out to be untrue.
C) actionable whenever it turns out to be false.
D) actionable if it induces a contract by falsely characterizing the factual consequences of a past legal action.
E) actionable if it induces a contract by misdescribing another's future action.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 78
Related Exams