Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Leveraged buyouts (LBOs) occur when a firm issues equity and uses the proceeds to take a firm public.
B) In a typical LBO, bondholders do well but shareholders see their value decline.
C) Firms are forbidden by law to sell any assets during the first five years following a leverage buyout.
D) Not all target firms are acquired by publicly traded corporations. In recent years, an increasing number of firms have been acquired by private equity firms. Private equity firms raise capital from wealthy individuals and look for opportunities to make profitable investments.
E) In an LBO sometimes the acquiring group plans to run the acquired company for a number of years, boost its sales and profits, and then take it public again as a stronger company. In other instances, the LBO firm plans to sell off divisions to other firms that can gain synergies. In either case, the acquiring group expects to make a substantial profit from the LBO, but the inherent risks are small due to the heavy use of venture capital and very little debt.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) $129.96
B) $136.80
C) $144.00
D) $151.20
E) $158.76
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If a company that produces military equipment merges with a company that manages a chain of motels, this is an example of a horizontal merger.
B) A defensive merger is one where the firm's managers decide to merge with another firm to avoid or lessen the possibility of being acquired through a hostile takeover.
C) Acquiring firms send a signal that their stock is undervalued if they choose to use stock to pay for the acquisition.
D) In a liquidation, the firm's existing stockholders are given new stock representing separate ownership rights in the division that was divested. The division establishes its own board of directors and officers, and it becomes a separate company.
E) If there are no synergistic benefits to be gained from a merger, the acquiring company will stop its plans for the merger. However, if synergistic gains are large, plans for the merger will continue. In fact, the greater the synergistic gains, the smaller the gap between the target's current price and the maximum the acquiring company could pay because of the acquiring company's upper hand in the merger.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) raising antitrust issues.
B) developing poison pills.
C) getting white knights to bid for the firm.
D) repurchasing their own stock.
E) engaging in risk arbitrage.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) $66,680,846
B) $70,190,364
C) $73,699,883
D) $77,384,877
E) $81,254,121
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Tax considerations often play a part in mergers. If one firm has excess cash, purchasing another firm exposes the purchasing firm to additional taxes. Thus, firms with excess cash rarely undertake mergers.
B) The smaller the synergistic benefits of a particular merger, the greater the scope for striking a bargain in negotiations, and the higher the probability that the merger will be completed.
C) Since mergers are frequently financed by debt rather than equity, a lower cost of debt or a greater debt capacity are rarely relevant considerations when considering a merger.
D) Managers who purchase other firms often assert that the new combined firm will enjoy benefits from diversification, including more stable earnings. However, since shareholders are free to diversify their own holdings, and at what's probably a lower cost, research of U.S. firms suggests that in most cases, diversification through mergers does not increase the firm's value.
E) Research of U.S. firms suggests that managers' personal motivations have had little, if any, impact on firms' decisions to merge.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The high value of the U.S. dollar relative to Japanese and European currencies in the 1980s, made U.S. companies comparatively inexpensive to foreign buyers, spurring many mergers.
B) During the 1980s, the Reagan and Bush administrations tried to foster greater competition and they were adamant about preventing the loss of competition; thus, most large mergers were disallowed.
C) The expansion of the junk bond market made debt more freely available for large acquisitions and LBOs in the 1980s, and thus, it resulted in an increased level of merger activity.
D) Increased nationalization of business and a desire to scale down and focus on producing in one's home country has virtually halted cross-border mergers today.
E) Because strategic alliances and joint ventures are easy to form and enable firms to compete better in the global economy than would mergers, merger activity has virtually come to a halt in the 21st century.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Synergistic benefits arising from mergers.
B) Reduction in competition resulting from mergers.
C) Acquisition of assets at below replacement value.
D) Attempts to minimize taxes by acquiring a firm with large accumulated losses that can be used immediately.
E) Using surplus cash to acquire another firm and prevent unfavorable tax consequences for shareholders.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 39
Related Exams